¶1specially concurring.
¶2This case involves the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. I agree with the majority result. I write specially to *194disassociate myself from the majority statement that the primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to protect constitutional rights. 91 Or App at 193, citing State v. Tanner, 304 Or 312, 315, 745 P2d 757 (1987). I agree with Judge Jones’ dissent in Tanner. 304 Or at 326.