Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 SO2D 67 - Purnell v. Jackson

Purnell v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1962
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Oakes v. H. Weil Baking Co. · Finkelstein v. Naihaus · Bonneval v. American Coffee Co. · 59 So. 2d 718 - Smith v. Parker · Landry v. Himel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is well settled in Louisiana that a plaintiff can recover civil damages in an action for assault and battery committed without legal ' excuse unless he provoked the difficulty by conduct calculated to arouse the resentment or fears of the defendant. However, the courts have found sufficient fault on the part of plaintiff to bar his recovery where he struck or attempted to strike the first blow.” (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.