Camus v. Bienvenue’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1994
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 84 So. 2d 634 - Rhymes v. Guidry · Dubois v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Horrell v. Gulf & Valley Cotton Oil Co. · Alengi v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · 60 So. 2d 131 - Jenkins v. AR Blossman, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Because plaintiff has proved he sustained damage in this regard, and has offered detailed testimony as to this-loss, accepted by the trial court, but found incompetent in this Court as-proof, in the interest of justice we will likewise remand this portion of the claim for further proof as to the amount of the loss, Article 906, Code of Practice, J. R. Watkins Co. v. Brumfield, La.App., 1 Cir., 86 So.2d 263, 266 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Granata v. Simpson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.