Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 So. 3d 56 - Williams v. Williams

91 So. 3d 56 - Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co. · Sherrer v. Sherrer · Davis v. Davis · 136 N.C. App. 56 - Twaddell v. Anderson · Whisman v. Alabama Power Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the [Missouri] divorce judgment did not order the mother to pay regular child support due to her unemployment, the trial court concluded that the divorce judgment did award child support by requiring the mother to pay a share of the children’s medical and dental expenses. The father does not dispute that finding. Hence, this was not a case in which a foreign jurisdiction had failed to address child support so that no registration of the previously entered foreign judgment would have been required. See Ex parte Davis, 82 So.3d 695, 701 (Ala.Civ.App.2011) [Davis m”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.