Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 SW2D 857 - Fox v. Young

Fox v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2003

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

3019361940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 34 Tex. Civ. App. 256 - Ellis v. Riddick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Constructive delivery is a general term comprehending all those acts which, although not truly conferring a real possession of the thing sold on a vendee, have been held constructione juris, equivalent to acts of real delivery. 12 C.J. p. 1303.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “herewith tender and do deliver to you possession”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.