Candelas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 243rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois · United States v. Bafia · Dublin v. United States Bankruptcy Court · Norris v. State · United States v. Rashed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One exception to the dual-sovereignty doctrine is the sham-prosecution.” Discussing Bartkus v. Illinois, the El Paso Court wrote that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. KAPPMEYER v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.