Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Wash. 2d 336 - State v. Murdock

91 Wash. 2d 336 - State v. Murdock’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2011 · most notably 115 Wash. 2d 506 - ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co. (1990), 105 Wash. 2d 175 - State v. Ammons (2005)

35 state decisions

13019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Burgett v. Texas · 5 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Furth · 52 Wash. 2d 676 - State v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “institutional records documenting commitments, which include copies of the judgments, sentences, and identification materials, are admissible solely to prove the identity of the defendant. Copies of the judgment and sentence which are to be admitted to prove the fact of any conviction must be certified by the court with the seal of the court annexed, as required by RCW 5.44.010.[ 47 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Obviously the State believed he had been convicted, and took his testimony as proof of the fact. But the State's obligation is to prove that fact to the jury, and it simply failed to introduce any competent evidence in this regard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We must `indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver' of fundamental constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.