Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Wash. 2d 638 - State v. Wicke

91 Wash. 2d 638 - State v. Wicke’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably 100 Wash. 2d 26 - Smith v. Shannon (1983), 119 Wash. 2d 711 - State v. Belgarde (1992)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 80 state decisions

37019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Boykin v. Alabama · Hodges v. Easton · 85 Wash. 2d 730 - State v. Fagalde · 85 Wash. 2d 29 - State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to preserve error for consideration on appeal, the general rule is that the alleged error must be called to the trial court's attention at a time that will afford the court an opportunity to correct it. State v. Fagalde, 85 Wash.2d 730 , 539 P.2d 86 (1975). Ideally, this will be done during the course of trial, but the error may be raised in a motion for a new trial. Seattle v. Harclaon, 56 Wash.2d 596 , 354 P.2d 928 (1960).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Cases required to be tried by jury shall be so tried unless the defendant files a written waiver of a jury trial, and has consent of the court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “every reasonable presumption should be indulged against the waiver . . . absent an adequate record to the contrary.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.