91 Wash. App. 187 - State v. Dolson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Bell v. Burson · State v. Storhoff · 56 Wash. App. 725 - Fraser v. Beutel · 62 Wash. App. 608 - Department of Social & Health Services v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“He had an opportunity to raise his due process claim during the adjudication of his first conviction for driving while license revoked in the first degree in 1992. Having had notice and opportunity, he cannot seriously argue a due process violation here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Perry“The notice must be reasonably calculated to inform the affected party of the pending action and of the opportunity to object.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Perry“technically violated, the spirit of the statute was not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dolson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.