91 Wis. 2d 540 - May v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1996
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Louisiana · Apodaca v. Oregon · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Comfort v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Assistance is the essence of aiding and abetting. Assistance, once given, is an accomplished fact. If the other elements are met, the completed act of aiding and abetting has occurred. The same may be said of an agreement which is the essence of conspiracy. The legislature, however, in sec. 939.05(2)(c), Stats., has expressly provided that a conspirator may undo that which he has done. He does so only by meeting the conditions of an effective withdrawal from the conspiracy. The right to withdraw from a conspiracy is appropriate because, "One of the objectives of the criminal law is to prevent crime, and thus it is desirable to provide an inducement to those who have counseled and aided a criminal scheme to take steps to deprive their complicity of effectiveness." It may be that this objective would be met by permitting withdrawal from aiding and abetting. Section 939.05(2)(b), Stats., however, is silent as to withdrawal from aiding and abetting. We construe that silence as a decision that an aider and abettor, unlike a conspirator, may not undo his completed act by withdrawal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Immediately after the . . . telephone conversation with the officer he changed his mind about going ahead with that transaction. He told Ms. Olson that she should abandon the transaction because he believed the caller was a police officer. [May] was present when the officer arrived but did not in any way involve himself in the delivery and received nothing from the transaction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“That assistance constituted aiding and abetting: procuring a purchaser to buy amphetamines from Ms. Olson, directly or indirectly, with intent to assist her to make a sale which was consummated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.