Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

910 A.2d 775

Stilp v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 2006

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2006-11-13

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2018

21 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-11-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1CONCURRING OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

¶2I concur with the majority’s resolution of this controversy except for allowing Stilp to file a second amended petition containing further averments as to the Treasurer and as to Count XIII(i) (WAMs). After having been given two opportunities to state a cognizable claim, Stilp has failed to do so. I believe that this is because he cannot do so; therefore, I would sustain with prejudice the preliminary objections and dismiss these two counts of the complaint.

Judge McGINLEY joins in this concurring opinion.
/910/a2d/775 · .json · Public domain