Mareno v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis
910 F.2d 1043 · 1990
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably PDK Labs, Inc. v. Friedlander (1997), Whitaker v. American Telecasting, Inc. (2001)
28 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co. · Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. · Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc. · Oliveri v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonable argument to extend, modify or reverse the law as it stands.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he situs of the injury is the location of the original event which caused the injury, not the location where the resultant damages are felt by the plaintiff.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“vexatious tactics or manifest bad faith.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.