Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 F.2d 1203 - Jamil v. Secretary, Department of Defense

Jamil v. Secretary, Department of Defense’s Empirical Analysis

910 F.2d 1203 · 1990

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 16 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Hughes v. Derwinski (1992), Stehney v. Perry (1996)

26 federal appellate · 16 district ·

4701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7513 · 5 U.S.C. § 7702

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plaintiff must first make out a prima facie case of discrimination. Establishing a prima facie case shifts a burden of production to the defendant to present evidence of a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse action. If the defendant produces evidence of such a reason, then the plaintiff must show that the reason presented by the defendant is merely a pretext for discrimination. The plaintiff retains the ultimate burden of persuasion throughout the process.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Title VII is not a general “bad acts” statute; it only addresses discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, and national origin....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “question of whether Egan precludes courts from reviewing security clearance decisions”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.