Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 F.2d 1273 - Johnson v. Odom

Johnson v. Odom’s Empirical Analysis

910 F.2d 1273 · 1990

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
July 2016
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Butz v. Economou

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Johnson’s claim for relief rests on the allegations that the Department of Agriculture, through the named defendants, 1) encouraged péijured testimony to facilitate adjudicating him guilty of violating Louisi ana’s Pesticide Control laws and 2) singled him out for prosecution and revocation of his license using illegally obtained evidence. Such actions, if true, would violate Johnson’s due process rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We affirm the district court’s determination that 1) the defendants are not entitled to absolute immunity status and 2) a material issue of fact exists as to the defendants’ claims for qualified immunity making summary judgment improper.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.