Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 F.2d 1374 - Gold Emporium, Inc. v. Commissioner

Gold Emporium, Inc. v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

910 F.2d 1374 · 1990

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
April 2018
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Blohm v. Commissioner (1993), Pittman v. Commissioner (1996)

24 federal appellate ·

300199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6653

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Welch v. Helvering · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · United States v. Janis · Lerch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n certain quite limited circumstances . . . courts recognize that an assessment should not be accorded even a rebuttable presumption of correctness. For example, when the assessment is shown to be 'without rational foundation' or 'arbitrary and erroneous,' the presumption should not be recognized. . . . As long as the procedures used and the evidence relied upon by the government to determine the assessment had a rational foundation, the inquiry focuses on the merits of the tax liability, not on IRS procedures.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally speaking, the [IRS'] tax deficiency assessments are entitled to the 'presumption of correctness.' This presumption imposes upon the taxpayer the burden of proving that the assessment is erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he arbitrary and excessive doctrine is a challenge to the deficiency assessment itself on the basis that it bears no factual relationship to the taxpayer's liability, not a challenge to any proof offered by the Commissioner at trial before the Tax Court or district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.