Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 F.2d 357 - Olle v. Henry & Wright Corp.

Olle v. Henry & Wright Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

910 F.2d 357 · 1990

Citation profile

183
cited by 183 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 183 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local No v. Superline Transportation Company Inc (1992), Mallory v. Eyrich (1991)

61 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

7901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Ackermann v. United States · Klapprott v. United States · General Electric Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers · Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc. v. Maley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 183 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unusual and extreme situations where principles of equity mandate relief.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only in exceptional or extraordinary circumstances which are not addressed by the first five numbered clauses of the Rule.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.