Rose v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis
910 F.2d 400 · 1990
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Verdin v. O'Leary (1992), Kathleen Braun v. Barbara Powell (2000)
17 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wainwright v. Sykes · Michigan v. Long · Harris v. Reed · 123 Ill. 2d 184 - People v. Reddick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“creates a federal claim through In re Winship [ 397 U.S. 358 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970) ].”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we must decide ... whether the trial court's constitutional error was harmless,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Green v. Peters · Rosa v. Peters“must not only rely on the procedural default, it must actually state that it is doing so and that other grounds are reached only in the alternative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.