No. 88-2212ne’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2021
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson · Collett Kitpatrick v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co · United States v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The task of resolving a dispute over the scope of section 1955(d)’s forfeiture provision begins with the language of the statute itself. When used without qualification, the word “property” includes both real and personal property within its sweep. Indeed, Congress’ use of the word “any” to describe property “undercuts a narrower construction.” The language of the forfeiture provision is plain and clear: Real property used in illegal gambling operations may be seized and forfeited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress' failure to supplement [section 1955(d) 's] comprehensive phrase--'any property'--with an exclamatory 'and we even mean [real property]' does not lessen the force of the statute's plain language.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“United States v. Monsanto , 491 U.S. 600 , 109 S. Ct. 2657 , 105 L. Ed. 2d 512 , [607] * * * (1989). The words in question here are commonly understood, and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.