Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 F.2d 518 - Taylor v. Farrier

Taylor v. Farrier’s Empirical Analysis

910 F.2d 518 · 1990

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
April 2018
most recently cited

18 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably United States v. Brown (1996), United States v. Hamell (1991)

18 federal appellate ·

210199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Raddatz · United States v. Walters · Orpiano v. Johnson · Hill v. Duriron Co. · Lorin Corporation v. Goto & Company, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not relieve the district court of its statutory and constitutional obligation to make a de novo determination of the magistrate's findings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when no timely objection is filed the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.