United States v. O'Neal’s Empirical Analysis
910 F.2d 663 · 1990
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Taylor v. United States · Mistretta v. United States · In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the record is sufficiently complete to allow us to decide the issue.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the conduct set forth in the count of which the defendant was convicted involved use of explosives or, by its nature, presented a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the following elements: an unlawful or unprivileged entry into or remaining in a building or other structure, with intent to commit a crime.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.