United States v. Byrom’s Empirical Analysis
910 F.2d 725 · 1990
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably 1998-2 City of Tuscaloosa (1998), United States v. Cross (1991)
26 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 963
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Ohio v. Roberts · Bourjaily v. United States · United States v. Inadi · Batson v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before admitting a coeonspirator’s statement over an objection that the statement does not qualify under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), a district court must be satisfied that the party offering the testimony has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that ... the statement was made during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a liberal standard in determining whether a statement is made in furtherance of a conspiracy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“friend” who would be waiting in a parking lot for the transfer of cocaine. The”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.