Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 F.2d 749 - United States v. Nash

United States v. Nash’s Empirical Analysis

910 F.2d 749 · 1990

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
3
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably United States v. Schlei (1997), United States v. House (1991)

41 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

3801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3501 · 21 U.S.C. § 952

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Jackson v. Denno · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Irvin v. Dowd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “this statement did not amount to an illegal inducement:”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`We find that the district court was not clearly erroneous in accepting [the officer's] testimony that he only promised to make [the defendant's] cooperation known to the United States Attorney's office and gave no guarantee of a reduced sentence. Although [the officer] told [the defendant] that cooperating defendants generally”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the trial judge shall permit the jury to hear relevant evidence on the issue of voluntariness and shall instruct the jury to give such weight to the confession as the jury feels it deserves under all the circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.