Collier v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
910 F.2d 770 · 1990
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Alderman v. Zant (1994), Waldrop v. Jones (1996)
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Michigan v. Long · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Harris v. Reed · FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a petitioner has failed to present a claim to the state courts and under state procedural rules the claim has become procedurally defaulted, the claim will be considered procedurally defaulted in federal court.”) 5 . Hallford may also circumvent the procedural bar by showing that failure to hear his claim would result in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hallford v. Culliver“[T]he state court that is usually the final arbiter of such [a] collateral attack[ ] on [a] criminal conviction[ ] was not afforded a fair opportunity to rule on [it].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waldrop v. Jones“analogous to claims that have never been presented to a state court, and which have become procedurally barred under state rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waldrop v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.