Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 F.2d 831 - In Re Raymond G Bond

In Re Raymond G Bond’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
December 2022
most recently cited

6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably In re Donaldson Co. (1994), In re Alappat (1994)

6 district ·

2501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Greenman v. United States · Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is axiomatic that, in proceedings before the PTO, claims in an application are to be given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification, ... and that claim language should be read in light of the specification as it would be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “delay means included in said control means for delaying the seizure of said telephone line by said second circuit means for a predetermined time interval ...” held to be "means plus function”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.