Molina v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis
910 F.3d 1056 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Liteky et al United States · Reno v. Flores · Al Khouri v. Ashcroft · Naing Tun v. Gonzales · Marroquin-Ochoma v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Failure to raise an issue before the agency constitutes a failure to exhaust administrative remedies and deprives this court of jurisdiction to hear the matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mejia-Ramos v. Barr“court may review a final order of removal only if ... the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mejia-Ramos v. Barr“under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13 (b)(1)(iii)(A), (B). This”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mejia-Ramos v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.