Olivas-Motta v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis
910 F.3d 1271 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Montana v. United States · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if ... the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alanniz v. Barr“has no power to overrule circuit precedent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alanniz v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.