Camacho v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis
910 F.3d 378 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Infanzon v. Ashcroft · Patel v. U.S. Attorney General · Zhang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sarmadi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable [us] to perceive that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he BIA need not revisit in detail every issue raised concerning the original order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.