Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

910 F.3d 738

Docket Joseph A. Brown, Appellant v. C.O. Kemmerer; United States; B.R. Pealer; T. Crawford; C.O. J. Young; C.O. J. Treibly; C.O. J. Hardy; Lt. R. Miller; C.O. D. Herr; C.O. A. Craveling; C.O. J. Finck; C.O. R. Wickham; Lt. J. Sherman; Lt. Douh; Lt. J. Seeba; Lt. R. Johnson; Lt. P. Carrasquitto; P.A. S. Dees; P.A. L. Potter; P.A. Brennaman; P.A. H. Miosi; J. Carpenter; J. Russo

Docket Joseph A. Brown, Appellant v. Sarah Dees, Physician Assistant, USP

Docket No. 17-1222 No. 17-1527 No. 17-1714

Brown v. Sage

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2018

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2018-12-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2019

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-12-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Joseph A. BROWN, Appellant
v.
Dr. SAGE, (Psych Dept.); Dr. Eigenbrode, (Psych Dept.); Dr. Shouey, (Psych Dept.)

¶2ORDER SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶3D. Brooks Smith, Chief Judge *739A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above captioned cases, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court. The opinion entered September 7, 2018, and the amended judgment entered September 13, 2018, are hereby vacated.

/910/f3d/738 · .json · Public domain