Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 F.3d 842 - Jane Doe v. Dewine

Jane Doe v. Dewine’s Empirical Analysis

910 F.3d 842 · 2018

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 14071 (§ 170101 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In sum, because Doe's registration requirement stems from the determination of her likelihood of reoffending at the time of her classification hearing and is not dependent on her current dangerousness, she has no procedural due process right to a reclassification hearing. Further, the wisdom of Ohio's decision to make the determination of a sexual offender's future dangerousness permanent is not subject to a procedural due process challenge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[Doc. 54 at p. 12]. The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits state actors from depriving an individual of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. U.S. Const. amend. XIV.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the defendant acted under the color of state law to deprive the plaintiff of a definite liberty or property interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.