Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Rollerson · United States v. Woods · United States v. Castillo-Roman · Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C. · 394 Ill. App. 3d 762 - People v. Manoharan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he State bears the burden of proof at sentencing to show that a prior conviction qualifies for inclusion within the criminal-history score”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stewart · State v. Strobel“[d]etermining which party has the burden of proof,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Curtis“includes the equivalent of a stay of imposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.