Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 P.2d 1196 - State v. Harmon

State v. Harmon’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably State v. Thomas (1998), Brown & Root Industrial Service v. Industrial Commission of Utah (1997)

41 state decisions

2001995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Payton v. New York · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On certiorari, we review the decision of the court of appeals, not the decision of the trial court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[Q]uestions of law are reviewed for correctness, and the trial court's factual findings are reversed only if clearly erroneous.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “he 'could come back at a later time with a [search] warrant, which, he warned, was an 'unpleasant experience. " Id. (alteration in original). The defendant again refused to consent and left in her car. See id. The officer then ran a check on the defendant's driver license and, finding that it was suspended, followed the defendant, pulled her over, and placed her under arrest. See id. After putting the defendant in his marked patrol car, the officer "told [the defendant] that he knew she had drugs in her home, that he would have to get a warrant, and that they would 'tear [the defendant's] house apart,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.