State v. Lindgren’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crane v. Kentucky · State v. Pena · State v. Dunn · State v. Bishop · State v. Knight
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from the record what evidence would have been before the jury absent the trial court's error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under a Rule 403 analysis, the trial court may find evidence to be unfairly prejudicial, and therefore inadmissible, 'if it appeals to the jury's sympathies, arouses a sense of horror, provokes the instinct to punish, or otherwise may cause the jury to base its decision on something other than the established propositions of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Elven if we conclude the trial court's decision regarding admissibility was error, we will not reverse unless the error was harmful[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.