Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 P2D 1334 - Swingholm v. State

Swingholm v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2015

8 state decisions

40199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Mabry v. Johnson · Mabry v. Johnson · Mehring v. State · Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The victim impact statement is accorded special status under Wyo. Stat, § 7-21-108, including the right to appear before the sentencing court to offer an oral statement and request restitution. We find in that special status a limitation which confines the victim impact statement to information about a particular crime.... We hold the purpose of Wyo. Stat. § 7-21-108 is to permit the sentencing court to consider information about the harm caused by the defendant during the commission of the particular crime for which sentence is about to be imposed. Our holding does not mean, however, that information about other erimes or convie-tions unrelated to the particular crime for which sentence is about to be imposed is impermissible. W.R.Cr.P. 32(a) specifical ly permits information about the prior criminal record of the defendant and his characteristics to be considered by the trial court before imposing sentence. In evaluating character, the trial court, in exercising its discretion, may consider a broad range of reports and information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “go beyond the record to consider the defendant's past conduct and activities including evidence of crimes for which charges were filed but no conviction resulted. The seope of the inquiry may include the factual basis of dismissed charges "as well as hearsay reports implicating the defendant in other erimes if such reports are deemed sufficiently reliable."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[Fliled presentence reports and information are evidence for the exercise of sentencing discretion, subject only to rights of the convicted individual to deny, dispute or disprove.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.