Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 P.2d 433 - State v. Ham

State v. Ham’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2010

7 state decisions

50199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Morrissey v. Brewer · Nix v. Williams · Griffin v. Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(1) [tlhere [is] clear and positive testimony that the consent was "unequivocal and specific' and 'freely and intelligently given'; (2) the government ... prove[s] consent was given without duress or coercion, express or implied; and (8) ... there [is] convincing evidence that [the party] waived [its constitutional right against unreasonable searches and seizures]."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Bisner · State v. Tripp
  2. “defendant did not agree in advance to an unfettered right to search at any time for absolutely no reason”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. A.C.C. v. State · In Re ACC
  3. “1) the absence of a claim of authority to search by the officers; 2) the absence of an exhibition of force by the officers; 8) a mere request to search; 4) cooperation by the owner of the [property]; and 5) the absence of deception or trick on the part of the officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Bisner

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.