Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 P.2d 555 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2018

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

120199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Herrig v. Herrig · Slavens v. Board of County Commissioners · Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc. · Hatch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · R.D. v. W.H.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing a W.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal, this Court accepts all facts stated in the complaint as being true and views them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. We will sustain a W.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal only when it is certain from the face of the complaint that the plaintiff cannot assert any facts which would entitle him to relief.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue as to any material fact exists and when the prevailing party is entitled to have a judgment as a matter of law. A genuine issue of material fact exists when a disputed fact, if it were proven, would have the effect of establishing or refuting an essential element of the cause of action or defense which has been asserted by the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.