Breck v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson (2003), Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc. (2015)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 39 Cal. 3d 892 - Gutierrez v. Mofid · Dura Corp. v. Harned · 116 Cal. App. 2d 113 - Overholtzer v. Northern Counties Title Insurance · Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc. · Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. Racine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The discovery rule takes into account the sophistication of the plaintiff in the particular area of knowledge. [Citations.] *** [I]t might be reasonable for an insured to rely on an insurance broker’s statements about the scope of coverage, rather than reading and interpreting the detailed language of the exclusionary clauses. [Citation.] *** [The plaintiff] acted reasonably in relying on [his attorney] and the real estate agents to review the documents and identify problems.” Breck, 910 P.2d at 605-06 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the duty of the professional to use such skill, prudence, and diligence as other members of the profession commonly possess and exercise; (2) a breach of that duty; (3) a proximate causal connection between the negligent conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual loss or damage resulting from the professional's negligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sengupta v. Wickwire“Whenever in a civil case an appellant entitled thereto desires a stay on appeal, the appellant may present to the superior court for its approval a supersedeas bond which shall have such surety or sureties as the court requires.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.