910 So. 2d 1123 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. State · 607 So. 2d 1197 - Griffin v. State · Langston v. State · 749 So. 2d 1015 - Hilliard v. State · Swann v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his [Cjourt must accept as true the evidence which supports the verdict and will reverse only when convinced that the circuit court has abused its discretion in failing to grant a new trial. Only when the verdict is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence that to allow it to stand would sanction an unconscionable injustice will this [Cjourt disturb it on appeal. Thus, the scope of review on this issue is limited in that all evidence must be construed in the light most favorable to the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Austin v. State“Direct or circumstantial evidence may be used to prove venue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a statement that caused serious and irreparable damage”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.