910 So. 2d 287 - Pizzo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · Cabrera v. State · 620 So. 2d 1304 - Skaggs v. State · 783 So. 2d 1171 - Sewall v. State · KD v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As we did in Pizzo I [ Pizzo v. State, 916 So.2d 828 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)], we reverse Mrs. Pizzo's conviction for conspiracy to commit racketeering based on our determination that the trial court committed fundamental error in instructing the jury on the crime of conspiracy to commit racketeering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to otherwise participate in the affairs of the `enterprise' with the knowledge and intent that other members of the conspiracy would engage in at least two incidents of racketeering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“with the specific intent either to personally engage in at least two incidents of racketeering”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.