Cross v. Pumpco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp. · 706 So. 2d 43 - Cox v. Burke · 869 So. 2d 533 - Lofton v. State · 816 So. 2d 251 - Morgan v. Campbell · Ruiz v. City of Orlando
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that a party has sentiently set in motion an unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system's ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party's claim or defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Except in the most extreme cases, where it appears that the process of trial itself has itself been subverted, factual inconsistencies, and even false statements, are well managed through the use of impeachment and traditional discovery sanctions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.