Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 SO2D 397 - Politz v. Booth

Politz v. Booth’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 769 So. 2d 359 - Parisi v. Broward County · 727 So. 2d 251 - Gregory v. Rice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the purpose of a criminal contempt fine is to punish, [and] fines for civil contempt are considered coercive or compensatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[F]ines for civil contempt are considered coercive or compensatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.