910 So. 2d 591 - Watkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Nichols v. United States · McIlwain v. State · 536 So. 2d 1314 - Corley v. State · 461 So. 2d 1288 - Johnson v. State · Weaver v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen we find there to have been an abuse of discretion, we still `will not reverse an erroneous admission or exclusion of evidence unless the error adversely affects a substantial right of a party.' Thus, employing this standard, we examine the trial court's ruling for abuse of discretion, and if we find an abuse of discretion we then inquire into the effect, if any, the ruling had on a substantial right of the party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.