Reid v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State · 708 So. 2d 1327 - Duplantis v. State · 575 So. 2d 1 - Berry v. State · Clark v. State · 703 So. 2d 852 - In Re Estate of Mask
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Defendant is charged by indictment with the crime of possession of precursor chemicals with intent to unlawfully manufacture methamphetamine. To constitute the crime charged, there must be sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements: 1. That Angela Denise Johnson 2. knowingly or intentionally had in her possession 3. two or more of the following precursor chemicals, to-wit: ephedrine/pseudoephedrine, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, hexanes, heptanes, ammonium nitrate, and lithium, and 4. that at the time, Angela Denise Johnson intended to unlawfully manufacture methamphetamine under circumstances where one reasonably should know that precursor chemicals would be used to unlawfully manufacture methamphetamine. If the State has failed to prove any one or more of the above listed elements beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find that Angela Denise Johnson is “Not Guilty[]” of possession of precursor chemicals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.