Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 910 SO2D 726 - Cowart v. State

Cowart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 863 So. 2d 31 - Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore · 473 So. 2d 952 - Gavin v. State · 737 So. 2d 322 - Puckett v. State · Crawford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A witness "qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education" may testify and offer opinions if his "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue." M.R.E. 702. However, this Court will limit an expert's testimony to matters within his demonstrated area of expertise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “experience or expertise beyond that of an average adult.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.