Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

910 So. 2d 930

Dickson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 19, 2005

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-09-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2015

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-09-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this direct criminal appeal, the appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for various criminal offenses. We affirm the appellant’s convictions, but we vacate his sentences.

¶2Reflecting his understandable frustration with insensitive and ill-advised remarks made by the appellant prior to his sentencing, the trial judge unfortunately made remarks that placed his impartiality in doubt. In light of these remarks, the appellant’s sentences must be vacated.

¶3The appellant’s convictions are affirmed, his sentences are vacated, and this case is remanded for resentencing before a different judge.

ERVIN, ALLEN and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
/910/so2d/930 · .json · Public domain