910 So. 2d 940 - Chapman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections · Gethers v. State · 813 So. 2d 10 - Huffman v. State · Mazer v. Orange County · 820 So. 2d 317 - Milanick v. Town of Beverly Beach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Jenkins timely appealed. Mandamus To be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must have a clear legal right to the requested relief, the respondent must have an indisputable legal duty to perform the requested action, and the petitioner must have no other adequate remedy. Chapman v. State, 910 So.2d 940, 941 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). The State argues first that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A detainer is a request filed by a criminal justice agency with the institution in which a prisoner is incarcerated, asking the institution either to hold the prisoner for the agency or to notify the agency when release of the prisoner is imminent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.