Hensley v. Poole’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 875 So. 2d 1143 - Waddell & Reed, Inc. v. UNITED INVEST. LIFE INS. CO. · Richardson v. Lee High Apartments · 748 So. 2d 198 - J & M Bail Bonding Co. v. Hayes · 683 So. 2d 419 - SYSTEM DYNAMICS INTERN., INC. v. Boykin · Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In reviewing a trial court's findings of fact based on ore tenus evidence, this Court presumes those findings to be correct. Robbins v. Sanders , 890 So.2d 998 , 1008-09 (Ala. 2004). However, the `"ore tenus rule does not extend to cloak a trial judge's conclusions of law . . . with a presumption of correctness."' Ex parte Baron Servs. , 874 So.2d 545 , 549 (Ala. 2003) (quoting Eubanks v. Hale , 752 So.2d 1113 , 1144-45 (Ala. 1999))."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"A claim alleging breach of fiduciary duty sounds in tort, Brooks v. Hill , 717 So.2d 759 , 764 (Ala. 1998), and `[a] necessary element to be proven in an action alleging breach of duty is damages.' Williams v. Citizens Nat'l Bank of Shawmut , 570 So.2d 635 , 638 (Ala. 1990). Also, an essential element of a claim of tortious interference is damages. Parsons v. Aaron , 849 So.2d 932 , 946 (Ala. 2002)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.