Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

910 S.W.2d 319

Hemphill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1995

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2001

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-09-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/910/sw2d/319 · .json · Public domain