Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

910 S.W.2d 829

State v. Oldham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1995

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1995-11-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1998

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-11-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Opal Oldham was charged by information with sodomy, § 566.060.2, RSMo 1986. She was charged with acting in concert with her husband in abusing her daughter, who was less than fourteen years old. She appeals from her conviction, after jury trial for which she was sentenced to eight years imprisonment. The defendant contends that: (1) the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the conviction; (2) the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to mention other instances of abuse in the opening statement because this was evidence of other crimes and, as such, was improper; (8) the trial court erred in permitting improper questioning of a character witness. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

/910/sw2d/829 · .json · Public domain