Young v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
911 F.2d 180 · 1990
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Washington v. Garrett (1993), Robbins v. Social Security Administration (2006)
24 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Desrosiers v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Martinez v. Heckler · Key v. Heckler · Pitzer v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] claimant may have a listed impairment without being presumptively disabled if the claimant's impairment is not as severe as required under the findings for that impairment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not apply because Young could not perform the full range of light and sedentary work. The ALJ used the grids as a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Young v. W Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.