United States v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
911 F.2d 361 · 1990
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Carter v. Nesby · United States v. Chatman · United States v. Cunningham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Or. Rev. Stat. Sec. 164.215(1). Despite the clear holding of Cunningham, Hensley makes three separate arguments urging that Oregon's second-degree burglary statute does not meet the Taylor standard. First, Hensley contends that because Oregon sentencing guidelines do not classify second-degree burglary as a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in, a building or other structure, with intent to commit a crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“definition. 911 F.2d at 363 . Under Oregon law a person commits burglary in the second degree if he or she”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.